Moreover, no single piece of anthropomorphic art has been examined during common-law legal proceedings since the Friendly Frank's obscenity case in the United States back in 1986, as far as this author is aware. Like any obscenity law, it resides in a huge gray area of legal interpretation. The recent United Kingdom 'Cartoon Law' is untested. A full retraction and apology should be written in its place lest the FurteamTimes lose any credibility as a quality news source. The story's title is presumptuous, and the story presents opinion as fact, makes wild claims, and it threatens to cause hysteria and fear as it ripples through the fandoms. The recent article made by FurteanTimes' Editor-In-Chief Alexgrey is out-of-turn for professional journalistic writing.
